Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing · North Carolina

Dunn

Dunn, NC · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dunn runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Dunn: 2.2 TCR = 68% of Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dunn safety composite

Dunn scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2016→2024

Dunn injury rate improved

Dunn's TCR fell 6.1 from 6.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327331 · Dunn, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO Anchor - Lyndhurst
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anchor - Lyndhurst (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Dunn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dunn averages 2.2 TCR (68% of the Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dunn TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Dunn falls in its industry

321 Architectural block, concrete establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Architectural block, concrete employers in North Carolina.

Dunn (34 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dunn
Dunn (34 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Dunn has fewer employees than the Architectural block, concrete (e.g., flu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2021 6.1 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.1 6.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327331 · NC · Dunn

321 Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 80 employers in Dunn, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anchor - Lyndhurst 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchor - Holbrook 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOIL RETENTION PRODUCTS, INC. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northfield Block Sheffield 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2778 NC 50 South, Benson, NC 27504 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Natural Gas 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iredell Operations Center 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harnett Health System 920 FTE
CITY-NEAR 71041 725 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADUSA Dist DC 04 Dunn NC 703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dunn Distribution Center #6010 324 FTE
NAT-TCR Shelton Intermediate School 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Finance 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CITGO Linden Terminal 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stein's Garden & Home Oshkosh 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Express 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recorder's Office 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bodensteiner Implement Company Rowley Location 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hydrite - LaCrosse WI 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.