Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Michigan

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin

Gladwin, MI · ~60 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin: 1.0 TCR = 29% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin safety composite

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Gladwin, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/218
  • PHOTO Mayco Toledo
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mayco Toledo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin averages 1.0 TCR (29% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin TCR series: 2016=0 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 218 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Michigan.

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin (60 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin
D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin (60 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

D&W Fine Pack - Gladwin has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · MI · Gladwin

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 23 employers in Gladwin, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mayco Toledo 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simex Vinyl Extrusions 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4th Avenue 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teijin Automotive Technologies, INC 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Konos DBA Vande Bunte Eggs 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marquette Board of Light & Power 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton SC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE VanDam & Krusinga Building and Restoration 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidMichigan Medical Center-Gladwin 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Master Electric Inc. 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gladwin Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gladwin Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 110 FTE
NAT-TCR McKay's Market Lakeside #14 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brand Energy Infrastructure Services of Puerto Rico Corp. - 291 - Puerto Rico Branch 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodbridge 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR OH - Columbus - 950 Stelzer Rd - The American Bottling Company 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Globalize Solutions LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dixie Construction Services, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoneybrook Assisted Living 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Andrews Construction Services Corp. 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.