Differential pressure instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Indiana

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN

Michigan City, IN · ~225 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Differential pressure instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Differential pressure instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN safety composite

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2022→2024

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN injury rate improved

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.5 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Michigan City, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/13
  • PHOTO Scanivalve Corp
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~225 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scanivalve Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Differential pressure instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN TCR series: 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN falls in its industry

322 Differential pressure instrume establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 13 Differential pressure instrume employers in Indiana.

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN (225 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN
Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN (225 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Dwyer Instruments Inc - Michigan City IN has more employees than the Differential pressure instruments, indus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.5 0.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · IN · Michigan City

322 Differential pressure instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 111 employers in Michigan City, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scanivalve Corp 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main office 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sensitech Inc 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peco InspX 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Swift Prepared Foods Elkhart 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE MAPLE LEAF FARMS, INC. - SERENADE & DC 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Middlebury Hardwood Products 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaPorte Production Facility 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franciscan Health Michigan City 938 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Chip Casino Hotel Spa 772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan City High School 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearthside Foods Solutions 602 FTE
NAT-TCR NV Energy-Beltway 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Horst Insurance 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Shinhwa Auto USA 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vacuworx Global LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Business Service Department 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Epredia 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillman Corporate Offices 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loc Performance - Lansing 225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.