Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing · Indiana

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc

Milford, IN · ~225 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc runs at 539% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing workplace, earning a grade F.

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc: 17.8 TCR = 539% of Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc safety composite

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.3

2016→2019

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc injury rate improved

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc's TCR fell 10.3 from 21.8 in 2016 to 11.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 21.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=21.8 · 2017=20.1 · 2019=11.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Milford, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.8 · 539% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #16/17
  • PHOTO Case Farms Canton Oh…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 101 inj
  • SIZE ~225 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Case Farms Canton Ohio garage (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc averages 17.8 TCR (539% of the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc TCR series: 2016=21.8 · 2017=20.1 · 2019=11.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc falls in its industry

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 17 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, employers in Indiana.

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc (225 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc
Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc (225 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - Serenade & Dc has fewer employees than the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 11.5 9.7 21 5 0
2017 20.1 17.2 44 5 0
2016 21.8 18.3 36 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · IN · Milford

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 18 employers in Milford, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Case Farms Canton Ohio garage 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Cromwell Hatchery 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAPLE LEAF FARMS, INC. - non-union HOLDING HOUSE & LIVE HAUL 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilkesboro Fresh Plant II 18.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Swift Prepared Foods Elkhart 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Middlebury Hardwood Products 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaPorte Production Facility 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wabash Plastics, Inc 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chore-Time - Milford 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Leaf Farms, Inc. - MLS Processing Plant 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., MLS Location 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brock - Milford 202 FTE
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-01672 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Les Schwab Tire Center-Pasco Road 68 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Casal - Salinas Center 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Frackville Vending 17.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Minigrip LLC 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bent County 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Health Care Center 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE LNS Kellogg - Old Lyme 225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.