Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing · Indiana

Dyer-Hadady Corporation

Dyer, IN · ~139 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dyer-Hadady Corporation runs at 287% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Dyer-Hadady Corporation: 9.5 TCR = 287% of Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dyer-Hadady Corporation safety composite

Dyer-Hadady Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dyer-Hadady Corporation: 7.8 → 76.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 76.9 TCR · DART/TCR 5.08× in 2022

Dyer-Hadady Corporation's TCR rose 69.1 from 7.8 in 2017 to 76.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 5.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336510 · Dyer, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 287% of ind

  • DART 48.1 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Dayton Phoenix Group…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dayton Phoenix Group Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Dyer-Hadady Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dyer-Hadady Corporation averages 9.5 TCR (287% of the Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dyer-Hadady Corporation TCR series: 2017=7.8 · 2018=12 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=14.3 · 2022=76.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Dyer-Hadady Corporation falls in its industry

208 Industrial locomotives and par establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Industrial locomotives and par employers in Indiana.

Dyer-Hadady Corporation (139 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dyer-Hadady Corporation
Dyer-Hadady Corporation (139 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Dyer-Hadady Corporation has more employees than the Industrial locomotives and parts manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 76.9 48.1 16 8 0
2021 14.3 5.0 16 1 0
2020 4.2 0.0 4 1 0
2019 9.1 4.3 13 2 0
2018 12.0 7.3 18 0 0
2017 7.8 1.6 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336510 · IN · Dyer

208 Industrial locomotives and parts manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 23 employers in Dyer, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dayton Phoenix Group Inc 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Industries-Midland 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchor Brake Shoe 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 5759_12563 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE J & J Electric of Indiana, Inc 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE The State Group Industrial USA Limited - Division 47 Indiana 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winona PVD Coatings, LLC. 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franciscan Health Dyer 901 FTE
CITY-NEAR Symphony of Dyer, LLC 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000000127 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000003127 184 FTE
NAT-TCR FL Toolholders 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 540842-Bre-West Hills Sta 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 404890-Lincoln City Po 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 314887-Las-East Las Vegas Sta 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lynwood-Hadady Corporation 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Luther College-Resident Dining 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Unc-Pembroke 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-AA-JAX-JACKSONVILLE-JAX-TRML 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.