Roofing, built-up tar and gravel, installation · Georgia

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc.

Gainesville, GA · ~45 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc. runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Roofing, built-up tar and gravel, installation workplace, earning a grade D.

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc.: 5.3 TCR = 190% of Roofing, built-up tar and gravel, installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc. safety composite

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc.: 0.0 → 10.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 10.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2017

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc.'s TCR rose 10.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 10.7 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Gainesville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 190% of ind

  • DART 10.7 DART
  • RANK #38/41
  • PHOTO Red Mountain Roofing…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Red Mountain Roofing LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc. averages 5.3 TCR (190% of the Roofing, built-up tar and gravel, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=10.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc. falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing, built-up tar and grav establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 41 Roofing, built-up tar and grav employers in Georgia.

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc. (45 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc.
Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc. (45 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Dyer Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. Inc. has more employees than the Roofing, built-up tar and gravel, instal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 10.7 10.7 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · GA · Gainesville

1,723 Roofing, built-up tar and gravel, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 306 employers in Gainesville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Red Mountain Roofing LLC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alcal Fremont Roofing 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tecta America Zero Company, LLC; DBA Tecta America Kentucky 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlson Racine Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc. 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CWT Farms International 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camilla Golden Peanut Treenut Pecan Shelling 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens TMC - 1004 Boulevard Athens, GA 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lombard 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. 5,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kubota Manufacturing of America Corporation 1,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poultry Processing 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Processing Plant 1,190 FTE
NAT-TCR 0125 - Dayton, Oh 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Oldcastle OPI - Littleton 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bloomington (Ilblo) 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4113-41131003-R12 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ADS Waverly 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE A.P. Eberlein Co., Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advance Transit, Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clean Venture Inc. - Clayton 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.