Electric contracting · Oregon

Dynalectric Oregon

Portland, OR · ~545 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dynalectric Oregon runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric contracting workplace, earning a grade A.

Dynalectric Oregon: 0.5 TCR = 18% of Electric contracting BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dynalectric Oregon safety composite

Dynalectric Oregon scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Dynalectric Oregon injury rate improved

Dynalectric Oregon's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/89
  • PHOTO Hi-Tech Electric - D…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~545 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hi-Tech Electric - Dallas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Dynalectric Oregon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dynalectric Oregon averages 0.5 TCR (18% of the Electric contracting BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dynalectric Oregon TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Dynalectric Oregon falls in its industry

4,550 Electric contracting establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 89 Electric contracting employers in Oregon.

Dynalectric Oregon (545 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dynalectric Oregon
Dynalectric Oregon (545 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Dynalectric Oregon has more employees than the Electric contracting median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.4 0.1 3 0 0
2022 0.5 0.0 4 0 0
2021 0.6 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.4 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 4 0 0
2018 0.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 3 0 0
2016 0.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · OR · Portland

4,550 Electric contracting employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hi-Tech Electric - Dallas 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piquette & Howard Electric Service, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tele-Optics Communication Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lynnwell Associates, Inc. 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Campus OHSU 545 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockford Corporation 543 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ed Staub & Sons Petroleum Inc. 548 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tillamook School District 9 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Jasper Seating Company Corporate Office 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Chevron Pipe Line Company - Houston 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Oceaneering International - Advanced Technologies Hanover 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Three Mile Island Nucler Power Station 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norfolk 545 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago North 545 FTE
NAT-SIZE IFB Solutions - Winston Salem 545 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield-417 Liberty Street 545 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.