Engineering research and development laboratories or services · Alabama

Dynetics Technical Solutions

Huntsville, AL · ~358 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dynetics Technical Solutions runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineering research and development laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade F.

Dynetics Technical Solutions: 1.3 TCR = 256% of Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dynetics Technical Solutions safety composite

Dynetics Technical Solutions scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2018→2024

Dynetics Technical Solutions injury rate improved

Dynetics Technical Solutions's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.7 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=1.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Huntsville, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.3 · 256% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO Mallard Creek Polyme…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~358 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mallard Creek Polymers LLC - Research (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Dynetics Technical Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dynetics Technical Solutions averages 1.3 TCR (256% of the Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dynetics Technical Solutions TCR series: 2018=0.7 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=1.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Dynetics Technical Solutions falls in its industry

319 Engineering research and devel establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Engineering research and devel employers in Alabama.

Dynetics Technical Solutions (358 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Dynetics Technical Solutions
Dynetics Technical Solutions (358 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Dynetics Technical Solutions has more employees than the Engineering research and development lab median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.1 0.8 4 0 0
2021 1.3 0.2 6 0 0
2020 1.6 0.3 5 0 0
2019 3.1 1.0 6 0 0
2018 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · AL · Huntsville

319 Engineering research and development laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 454 employers in Huntsville, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mallard Creek Polymers LLC - Research 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Novartis Institutes of Biomedical Research 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Subaru Telescope - NAOJ 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eli Lilly Lilly Corp Center 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fossil Generation Miller Steam Plant 358 FTE
STATE-SIZE 660 358 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moseley Technical Services, Inc. 358 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 904 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR AL004 2,929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dynetics A Leidos Company 2,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leidos - Dynetics 2,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Motor Mfg of Alabama 1,874 FTE
NAT-TCR Dufry Cruise Services LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Corpus Christi TX Terminal 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bottle Processing 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmetto Distribution Center 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Prometheus 358 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrisburg 024 358 FTE
NAT-SIZE Serco - San Diego,CA 358 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Roth Operation 358 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.