General Freight Trucking, Long-Distance, Truckload · North Dakota

E W Wylie Fargo

Fargo, ND · ~734 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E W Wylie Fargo runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Freight Trucking, Long-Distance, Truckload workplace, earning a grade D.

E W Wylie Fargo: 5.7 TCR = 127% of General Freight Trucking, Long-Distance, Truckload BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E W Wylie Fargo safety composite

E W Wylie Fargo scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2023→2024

E W Wylie Fargo injury rate improved

E W Wylie Fargo's TCR fell 0.5 from 5.9 in 2023 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=5.9 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Fargo, ND ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 127% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #11/17
  • PHOTO Cleveland Terminal
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 85 inj
  • SIZE ~734 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cleveland Terminal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

E W Wylie Fargo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E W Wylie Fargo averages 5.7 TCR (127% of the General Freight Trucking, Long-Distance, Truckload BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E W Wylie Fargo TCR series: 2023=5.9 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 4.5

Where E W Wylie Fargo falls in its industry

3,252 General Freight Trucking, Long establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 17 General Freight Trucking, Long employers in North Dakota.

E W Wylie Fargo (734 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate E W Wylie Fargo
E W Wylie Fargo (734 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

E W Wylie Fargo has more employees than the General Freight Trucking, Long-Distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 3.8 42 1 0
2023 5.9 4.6 43 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · ND · Fargo

3,252 General Freight Trucking, Long-Distance, Truckload employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 415 employers in Fargo, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Terminal 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Martin Trucking, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAKOTALAND TRANSPORTATION INC. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RG Transportation Inc 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2643-33180001-331801 749 FTE
STATE-SIZE TrueNorth Steel 764 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marvin Windows and Doors - Fargo 766 FTE
STATE-SIZE ND,FARGO -South University Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 702 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,963 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - North Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - Fargo Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Broadway Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,547 FTE
NAT-TCR Lone Star Medical Transportation 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakewood Senior Living,Drums ,LLC d/b/a/ Fritzingertown Senior Living Commuity 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Metals and Additives Plant 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR FIC Bloomingdale 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alvarado Hospital 734 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stanislaus Food Products 734 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waterford 3 734 FTE
NAT-SIZE TriStar Hendersonville Medical Center 734 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.