Nursing agencies, primarily providing home nursing services · Colorado

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley

Grand Junction, CO · ~86 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
5.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley runs at 178% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing agencies, primarily providing home nursing services workplace, earning a grade D.

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley: 9.3 TCR = 178% of Nursing agencies, primarily providing home nursing services BLS 5.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley safety composite

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley: 8.9 → 11.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 11.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2018

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley's TCR rose 2.8 from 8.9 in 2016 to 11.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621610 · Grand Junction, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.3 · 178% of ind

  • DART 10.2 DART
  • RANK #53/66
  • PHOTO Universal Pediatrics
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Universal Pediatrics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley averages 9.3 TCR (178% of the Nursing agencies, primarily providing home nursing services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley TCR series: 2016=8.9 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=11.7 · BLS 5.2

Where Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley falls in its industry

3,635 Nursing agencies, primarily pr establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 66 Nursing agencies, primarily pr employers in Colorado.

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley (86 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley
Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley (86 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley has more employees than the Nursing agencies, primarily providing ho median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 11.7 10.2 7 1 0
2017 7.2 7.2 5 0 0
2016 8.9 5.1 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621610 · CO · Grand Junction

3,635 Nursing agencies, primarily providing home nursing services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Universal Pediatrics 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay View Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Range Hospice 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Partners In Care Hospice, LLC 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Innova Global Inc 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE 102812 - Craig Generating Station - NOx Removal 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Faith Enterprises Incorporated 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Division #4 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR CBC - Verona Plant 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR All Star Corrugated 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Magnolia Lane Nursing & Rehab 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Island Fish Co LLC-Pacific Seafood 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Branson Office 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hydro - Portland Fabricated Components 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hutchens Construction Co 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.