Power generation, wind electric · New York

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY

Churubusco, NY · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY runs at 772% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Power generation, wind electric workplace, earning a grade F.

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY: 9.3 TCR = 772% of Power generation, wind electric BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY safety composite

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY: 5.8 → 22.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 22.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2018

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY's TCR rose 16.2 from 5.8 in 2016 to 22.0 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221115 · Churubusco, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 772% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Grand Ridge Energy C…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grand Ridge Energy Center (1.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY averages 9.3 TCR (772% of the Power generation, wind electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=22 · BLS 1.2

Where Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY falls in its industry

64 Power generation, wind electri establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Power generation, wind electri employers in New York.

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY (29 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY
Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY (29 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY has fewer employees than the Power generation, wind electric median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 22.0 8.8 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.8 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221115 · NY · Churubusco

64 Power generation, wind electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grand Ridge Energy Center 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACE - Storm Lake 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avangrid Renewables - El Cabo 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camp Springs Energy Center 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walnut Ridge Dairy LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE RG&E Canandaigua 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Norwich 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jamestown SC 29 FTE
NAT-TCR Magnolia Lane Nursing & Rehab 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Ridge of Grand Valley 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CBC - Verona Plant 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR All Star Corrugated 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ADL Dental Lab 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compassionate Care Hospice of Media 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tx510-Lpz-Tx510 Dallas Wh 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Hometown #794 (Qunicy, WA) 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.