Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Eagles Pointe

Goldsboro, NC · ~44 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eagles Pointe runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Eagles Pointe: 3.0 TCR = 80% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eagles Pointe safety composite

Eagles Pointe scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Eagles Pointe held a steady TCR band

Eagles Pointe's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Goldsboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #63/356
  • PHOTO Boulevard ALP
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boulevard ALP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Eagles Pointe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eagles Pointe averages 3.0 TCR (80% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eagles Pointe TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Eagles Pointe falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Eagles Pointe (44 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Eagles Pointe
Eagles Pointe (44 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Eagles Pointe has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.4 2.5 2 1 0
2019 10.8 4.3 5 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Goldsboro

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 145 employers in Goldsboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boulevard ALP 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Pointe Assisted Living of Mayodan 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63184 SUNRISE OF COHASSET 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teal Creek 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sleepy Creek Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE WMSTN 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morganton 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aqua Services, Inc. - Cary 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cherry Hospital 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Wayne - All 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR O'Berry Neuro Medical Treatment Center 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR AP Emissions 422 FTE
NAT-TCR New Millennium Building Systems, LLC. - Fallon 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Benny's Car Wash of Gonzales 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkel Piling Washington DC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR David Kopf Instruments 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Llano Masonry LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8400-DRC-WOODSTOCK 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE 36L7-EAN Holdings, LLC Hawaii Division 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smyth Companies - Green Bay 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.