Libraries (except motion picture stock footage, motion picture commercial distribution) · Minnesota

East Central Regional Library

Cambridge, MN · ~76 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

East Central Regional Library runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Libraries (except motion picture stock footage, motion picture commercial distribution) workplace, earning a grade D.

East Central Regional Library: 1.2 TCR = 169% of Libraries (except motion picture stock footage, motion picture commercial distribution) BLS 0.7 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

East Central Regional Library safety composite

East Central Regional Library scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2020→2023

East Central Regional Library injury rate improved

East Central Regional Library's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.2 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 519120 · Cambridge, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.2 · 169% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Newbury Park Library
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Newbury Park Library (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

East Central Regional Library in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows East Central Regional Library averages 1.2 TCR (169% of the Libraries (except motion picture stock footage, motion picture commercial distribution) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

East Central Regional Library TCR series: 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 0.7

Where East Central Regional Library falls in its industry

89 Libraries (except motion pictu establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Libraries (except motion pictu employers in Minnesota.

East Central Regional Library (76 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate East Central Regional Library
East Central Regional Library (76 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 1.9

East Central Regional Library has more employees than the Libraries (except motion picture stock f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

519120 · MN · Cambridge

89 Libraries (except motion picture stock footage, motion picture commercial distribution) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 75 employers in Cambridge, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Newbury Park Library 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheaton Public Library 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ankeny Kirkendall Public Library 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Library 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Twin City Framers 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fireside Hearth n Home Roseville 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schoenfelder Renovations 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridley Inc. 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cambridge Medical Center 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2352 460 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2352 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Isanti County Government Center 309 FTE
NAT-TCR 0067-HES Ft Lupton 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Blaise Alexander Chrysler Jeep Dodge 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR East China Schl Dist * 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Godfrey-Lee Pub Schl * 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eversource - Torrington 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Malcolm Drilling FL 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE RWH Construction Services 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE wedi Corp 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.