Libraries (except motion picture stock footage, motion picture commercial distribution) · Oregon

Library

Lake Oswego, OR · ~55 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Library runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Libraries (except motion picture stock footage, motion picture commercial distribution) workplace, earning a grade D.

Library: 1.1 TCR = 163% of Libraries (except motion picture stock footage, motion picture commercial distribution) BLS 0.7 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Library safety composite

Library scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Library held a steady TCR band

Library's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.3 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 3.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 519120 · Lake Oswego, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.1 · 163% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO LVCCLD
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LVCCLD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Library in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Library averages 1.1 TCR (163% of the Libraries (except motion picture stock footage, motion picture commercial distribution) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Library TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 0.7

Where Library falls in its industry

89 Libraries (except motion pictu establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Libraries (except motion pictu employers in Oregon.

Library (55 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Library
Library (55 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Library has more employees than the Libraries (except motion picture stock f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

519120 · OR · Lake Oswego

89 Libraries (except motion picture stock footage, motion picture commercial distribution) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 82 employers in Lake Oswego, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LVCCLD 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheaton Public Library 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Library 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Central Regional Library 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Roseburg Resources OR 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&G Logging & Construction 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babb Construction Co dba Delta Construction Co 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siegmund Excavation & Construction / Allied Rock 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mary's Woods at Marylhurst 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eclipse Support Center 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Springs at Lake Oswego 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1107 - NSM Mountain Park 140 FTE
NAT-TCR Mount Airy Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PACE Supply Yuba City Branch 8 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SDICDSI Kearny Mesa 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Electrical Construction Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Panacea Products - Joyce Avenue 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE sv2188 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stratford 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE 09 Sac Ltl 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.