Thermoforming machinery for plastics manufacturing · Michigan

EasyPak

Kalamazoo, MI · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EasyPak runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Thermoforming machinery for plastics manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

EasyPak: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Thermoforming machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EasyPak safety composite

EasyPak scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2021→2024

EasyPak injury rate improved

EasyPak's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.1 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Kalamazoo, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/42
  • PHOTO Hotronix
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hotronix (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

EasyPak in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EasyPak averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Thermoforming machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EasyPak TCR series: 2021=2.1 · 2022=6 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where EasyPak falls in its industry

448 Thermoforming machinery for pl establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 42 Thermoforming machinery for pl employers in Michigan.

EasyPak (48 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate EasyPak
EasyPak (48 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

EasyPak has fewer employees than the Thermoforming machinery for plastics man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2022 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · MI · Kalamazoo

448 Thermoforming machinery for plastics manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 353 employers in Kalamazoo, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hotronix 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPI, L.L.C. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glaston America 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR KERCHER ENTERPRISES INC 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sietsema Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.M. Longyear, LLC - Office & Forestry 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Top Grade Aggregates, LLC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bronson Methodist Hospital 4,909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer Kalamazoo - Portage Road 3,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Instruments 2,240 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIKAL1 2,103 FTE
NAT-TCR Mimir Flexo Printing 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Northampton 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR TSYS - Columbus North Center 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Crow River Construction LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Findlay Vinyl 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brighton 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applied Medical Technology 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pietrini Contractors, Inc. 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.