Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Michigan

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services

Charlotte, MI · ~321 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade B.

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services: 4.5 TCR = 69% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services safety composite

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services: 4.6 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2019

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services's TCR rose 0.5 from 4.6 in 2017 to 5.0 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Charlotte, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.5 · 69% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #101/471
  • PHOTO 1404 Long Pond Road …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~321 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1404 Long Pond Road Operating Company, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services averages 4.5 TCR (69% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=5 · BLS 6.5

Where Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #101 safest of 471 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Michigan.

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services (321 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services
Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services (321 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Eaton County Health & Rehabilitation Services has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.0 2.1 11 1 0
2018 3.8 2.5 7 2 0
2017 4.6 2.9 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Charlotte

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 39 employers in Charlotte, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1404 Long Pond Road Operating Company, LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walker Road Senior Living LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HILLCREST HOME INC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1138 RESPIRATORY AND REHAB CTR RI 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warren Service Center 321 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brand Energy Services, LLC - Detroit 321 FTE
STATE-SIZE AJM Packaging - Detroit 321 FTE
STATE-SIZE CWC Textron 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartan Motors, Inc. 805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utilimaster 534 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Eaton 455 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eaton County 422 FTE
NAT-TCR Product Resources 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mountain View Market 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Effingham County 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Reno Airport-5461 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fayette 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omega Morgan 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE Halliburton ICC 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plastics One, Inc 321 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.