Airport baggage handling services · Michigan

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT

Romulus, MI · ~321 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT runs at 272% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Airport baggage handling services workplace, earning a grade F.

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT: 12.3 TCR = 272% of Airport baggage handling services BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT safety composite

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.1

2016→2023

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT injury rate improved

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT's TCR fell 19.1 from 23.1 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 23.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=23.1 · 2017=15.5 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=16.6 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=14.3 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Romulus, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 272% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #33/33
  • PHOTO PF MCI
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 316 inj
  • SIZE ~321 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PF MCI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT averages 12.3 TCR (272% of the Airport baggage handling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT TCR series: 2016=23.1 · 2017=15.5 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=16.6 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=14.3 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=4 · BLS 4.5

Where Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT falls in its industry

1,555 Airport baggage handling servi establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 33 Airport baggage handling servi employers in Michigan.

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT (321 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT
Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT (321 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT has more employees than the Airport baggage handling services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.0 1.0 4 0 0
2022 7.5 1.0 34 3 0
2021 14.3 4.8 44 9 0
2020 10.2 3.7 20 2 0
2019 16.6 3.8 48 4 0
2018 6.7 1.7 40 3 0
2017 15.5 6.3 50 4 0
2016 23.1 11.7 76 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · MI · Romulus

1,555 Airport baggage handling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 199 employers in Romulus, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PF MCI 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEN-SAUSA 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9215-OMA 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAX082 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warren Service Center 321 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brand Energy Services, LLC - Detroit 321 FTE
STATE-SIZE AJM Packaging - Detroit 321 FTE
STATE-SIZE CWC Textron 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : DTW1 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DTW1 3,502 FTE
CITY-NEAR Romulus Powertrain 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Romulus 1,037 FTE
NAT-TCR Classic Healthcare Systems dba Franklin Ridge 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Atria West 86 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SIC Lazaro US, Inc 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Indeed Brewing Company - Minneapolis Brewery 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mayo Clinic Health System-Northland (Barron) 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meggitt (North Hollywood), INC. 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE Connecticut Natural Gas 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE Element Food Solution 321 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.