Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway · California

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc

Corona, CA · ~27 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc runs at 564% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway workplace, earning a grade F.

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc: 15.8 TCR = 564% of Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc safety composite

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc: 0.0 → 26.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 26.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.45× in 2023

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc's TCR rose 26.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 26.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Corona, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.8 · 564% of ind

  • DART 22.9 DART
  • RANK #538/551
  • PHOTO City of Michigan Cit…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Michigan City - Central Services - Street/Vector (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc averages 15.8 TCR (564% of the Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=15.6 · 2019=13 · 2020=19.6 · 2021=18.4 · 2022=17.7 · 2023=26.2 · BLS 2.8

Where EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc falls in its industry

4,078 Repair, highway, road, street, establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #538 safest of 551 Repair, highway, road, street, employers in California.

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc (27 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc
EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc (27 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc has fewer employees than the Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 26.2 22.9 8 0 0
2022 17.7 10.6 5 0 0
2021 18.4 14.7 5 0 0
2020 19.6 19.6 6 0 0
2019 13.0 13.0 2 1 0
2018 15.6 15.6 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · CA · Corona

4,078 Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Michigan City - Central Services - Street/Vector 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Road Commission of Kalamazoo County 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highway Department 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brunalli 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE HQ 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medeiros Farms Vineyards 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAND RANCH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Bernabe Vineyards 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR Steward Trumbull Memorial Hospital 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Morningside Care Center 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecdc Sortation Bldg 21 - 3039 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZOCL 15.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE HI-Honolulu 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bedford Medical Center 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Goldsboro/Fire Station 1 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Studio On Fire 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.