Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing · Hawaii

HI-Honolulu

Name: HI-Honolulu Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Honolulu, HI · ~27 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HI-Honolulu runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

HI-Honolulu: 3.6 TCR = 110% of Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HI-Honolulu safety composite

HI-Honolulu scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2016→2023

HI-Honolulu injury rate improved

HI-Honolulu's TCR fell 6.8 from 6.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Honolulu, HI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 110% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK P9
PHOTO JEM America Corp.
BOOK 7y book
INJ 9 inj
SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JEM America Corp. (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Hawaii employers → · Look up another →

Continental Co

3.9
This site

3.6
JEM America Co

3.4
Fluke Electron

3.3
Orbit Advanced

3.2

What this shows HI-Honolulu averages 3.6 TCR (110% of the Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

HI-Honolulu TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=3 · 2019=0 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where HI-Honolulu falls in its industry

125 Digital test equipment (e.g., establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

HI-Honolulu (27 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

HI-Honolulu has fewer employees than the Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0
2022	4.5	4.5	1	0
2021	5.3	3.5	3	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0
2018	3.0	3.0	1	0
2017	5.7	0.0	2	0
2016	6.8	4.5	2	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · HI · Honolulu

125 Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,022 rated employers in Hawaii with headcount on file · 796 employers in Honolulu, HI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	JEM America Corp.	FREMONT, CA	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Continental Control Systems, LLC	LONGMONT, CO	3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way	EVERETT, WA	3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Orbit Advanced Technologies, Inc.	WARMINSTER, PA	3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. Wahiawa	KALAHEO	27 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Niking Corporation	WAHIAWA	27 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Kapolei, HI Office CS	KAPOLEI	27 FTE
STATE-SIZE	4829-13640	KAILUA KONA	27 FTE
CITY-NEAR	9095-HNL	Honolulu	5,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HNL HONOLULUL	Honolulu	4,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Hawaiian Airlines - HNL	Honolulu	4,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR	12812007 MOANALUA MEDICAL OFFICES	Honolulu	2,355 FTE
NAT-TCR	Interim HealthCare - Pensacola	Pensacola, FL	3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Allied Moulded Products, Inc.	Bryan, OH	3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Mother Lode Van & Storage, Inc	Rancho Cordova, CA	3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	B.R Funsten & Co 02	Manteca, CA	3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Bedford Medical Center	Lynchburg, VA	27 FTE
NAT-SIZE	EBS Utilities Adjusting Inc	Corona, CA	27 FTE
NAT-SIZE	City of Goldsboro/Fire Station 1	Goldsboro, NC	27 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Studio On Fire	Saint Paul, MN	27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.