Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Texas

Ec Abs San Antonio Central

San Antonio, TX · ~57 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ec Abs San Antonio Central runs at 359% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Ec Abs San Antonio Central: 13.6 TCR = 359% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ec Abs San Antonio Central safety composite

Ec Abs San Antonio Central scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.6

2016→2019

Ec Abs San Antonio Central injury rate improved

Ec Abs San Antonio Central's TCR fell 22.6 from 24.8 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 24.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=24.8 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=19.6 · 2019=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 359% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #51/56
  • PHOTO Lake Street
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lake Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Ec Abs San Antonio Central in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ec Abs San Antonio Central averages 13.6 TCR (359% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ec Abs San Antonio Central TCR series: 2016=24.8 · 2017=8 · 2018=19.6 · 2019=2.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Ec Abs San Antonio Central falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 56 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Texas.

Ec Abs San Antonio Central (57 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ec Abs San Antonio Central
Ec Abs San Antonio Central (57 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Ec Abs San Antonio Central has fewer employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2018 19.6 7.3 8 0 0
2017 8.0 5.3 3 0 0
2016 24.8 0.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · TX · San Antonio

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lake Street 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Works Vocational and Day Services 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Day Program SCLH 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Handley Res 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Tyler Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Waco Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Natural Resources Cedar Lake location 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKJ Transport - Energy Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Ridge Center 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR True Value Denver RDC 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Waupaca Foundry, Inc. Plant 7L Lawrenceville 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McKinley Center 13.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE SD,CLEAR LAKE - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE CCI- Hayesville Plant 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deland Pipe & Precast 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Tenet Lakewood Reg M/C Fans 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.