General Warehousing and Storage · Wisconsin

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039

Eau Claire, WI · ~65 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade F.

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039: 11.9 TCR = 205% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 safety composite

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−26.7

2018→2024

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 injury rate improved

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039's TCR fell 26.7 from 32.4 in 2018 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 32.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=32.4 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=16.0 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Eau Claire, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 205% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #184/195
  • PHOTO Andis Company Enterp…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andis Company Enterprise (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 averages 11.9 TCR (205% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 TCR series: 2018=32.4 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=16 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #184 safest of 195 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Wisconsin.

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 (65 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039
Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 (65 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 0.0 3 0 0
2023 4.7 0.0 2 0 0
2022 4.7 3.1 3 0 0
2021 16.0 0.0 10 0 0
2020 12.1 4.5 8 0 0
2019 7.5 1.9 4 0 0
2018 32.4 8.1 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · WI · Eau Claire

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 271 employers in Eau Claire, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andis Company Enterprise 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4186-DC3 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DTW3 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMZL : DPD5 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABS Global - Leeds 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE I E I GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reesman's Excavating and Grading 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE The State Group Industrial USA Limited - Division 48 Wisconsin 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Precision Pipeline, LLC 3,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Hospital (Whipple) 3,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR WWD Sacred Heart Hospital 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR STORE DIVISION ADMIN - 3019 900 FTE
NAT-TCR Holden Oil - Peabody 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Village Markets LLC- RAYMOND LOCATION 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Browns Valley Health Center 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PHLLESTERPA 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Climate Pros Fairfield 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE R.P. Manley & Co. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Sports Events, LLC 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pumping Services Inc. 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.