Group homes for the disabled with nursing care · Ohio

Echoing Valley Residential Center

Dayton, OH · ~38 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Echoing Valley Residential Center runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Group homes for the disabled with nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Echoing Valley Residential Center: 7.1 TCR = 109% of Group homes for the disabled with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Echoing Valley Residential Center safety composite

Echoing Valley Residential Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Echoing Valley Residential Center: 2.5 → 11.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 14.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.2× in 2024

Echoing Valley Residential Center's TCR rose 8.8 from 2.5 in 2016 to 11.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Dayton, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.1 · 109% of ind

  • DART 8.5 DART
  • RANK #609/1074
  • PHOTO Rocky Mount Rehabili…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rocky Mount Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Echoing Valley Residential Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Echoing Valley Residential Center averages 7.1 TCR (109% of the Group homes for the disabled with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Echoing Valley Residential Center TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=14.1 · 2020=5 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=12 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=11.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Echoing Valley Residential Center falls in its industry

15,252 Group homes for the disabled w establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #609 safest of 1074 Group homes for the disabled w employers in Ohio.

Echoing Valley Residential Center (38 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Echoing Valley Residential Center
Echoing Valley Residential Center (38 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Echoing Valley Residential Center has fewer employees than the Group homes for the disabled with nursin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.3 8.5 2 2 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 12.0 6.0 4 0 0
2021 10.4 10.4 4 0 0
2020 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2019 14.1 14.1 4 0 0
2018 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Dayton

15,252 Group homes for the disabled with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rocky Mount Rehabilitation Center 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northgate Postacute Care 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spruce LTC Group, LLC d/b/a Wilson Pines Nursing & Rehabiliation 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Letcher Manor 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano OH CPG - Mothers Grow Best 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Velvet Sod Farms 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pride Transportation Co, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union City 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Jacksonville Distribution 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Township of Franklin Police 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Commonwealth Packaging Corporation 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NRHN Nashua 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE PARKS - Lakeville 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hollister CA 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nta Operations Pmo 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Francisco Nob Hill 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.