Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · Florida

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO

Melbourne, FL · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade D.

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO: 11.5 TCR = 199% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO safety composite

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2021→2023

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO injury rate improved

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO's TCR fell 1.5 from 18.0 in 2021 to 16.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=18.0 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=16.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Melbourne, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 11.5 · 199% of ind

  • DART 16.5 DART
  • RANK #388/412
  • PHOTO Dunn Distribution Ce…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dunn Distribution Center #6010 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO averages 11.5 TCR (199% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO TCR series: 2021=18 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=16.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #388 safest of 412 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in Florida.

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO (50 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO
Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO (50 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Eclipse Advantage - CVSMO - Kansas City, MO has fewer employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 16.5 16.5 2 0 0
2022 0.1 0.1 3 0 0
2021 18.0 15.9 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · FL · Melbourne

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dunn Distribution Center #6010 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grove Collaborative - Pennsylvania Fulfillment Center 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6140-61400105 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - PHL5 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushnell 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine foods Lake City 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & M Packing LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walton Service Center 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR Vinton Construction Company 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Granite City Wastewater Treatment Plant 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Innisfree Health and Rehab 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel Solamar 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE New-Mac Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Neosho, MO 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE M.L.Jones LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZZ Galvanizing - Beaumont 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Heating & Cooling 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.