Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · Florida

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA

Melbourne, FL · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade B.

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA: 4.5 TCR = 78% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA safety composite

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2020→2022

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA injury rate improved

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA's TCR fell 6.1 from 6.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.1 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Melbourne, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.5 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #243/412
  • PHOTO Book Fairs - Raleigh
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Book Fairs - Raleigh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA averages 4.5 TCR (78% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA TCR series: 2020=6.1 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #243 safest of 412 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in Florida.

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA (29 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA
Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA (29 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Eclipse Advantage - RAWOODCA - Woodland, CA has fewer employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.5 7.5 2 0 0
2020 6.1 6.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · FL · Melbourne

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Book Fairs - Raleigh 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Galesburg 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stockton East 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prime Now LLC - USF1 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE RB Farms, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE JW Turf Farms 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heart of Florida Greenhouses, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Gardens Citrus Nursery, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0452 OSI - West Chicago 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hickey Metal Fabrication & Roofing Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SRG Global Coatings LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1137 - Rochester-NH 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Agri Supply of Florence 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0674 Schwan's - Florence KY 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0398 Blount Fine Foods 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0377 Pilgrim's Corp - Mt. Pleasant Kill 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.