Lighting maintenance services (e.g., bulb and fuse replacement and cleaning) · California

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical

Anaheim, CA · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Lighting maintenance services (e.g., bulb and fuse replacement and cleaning) workplace, earning a grade D.

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical: 5.9 TCR = 132% of Lighting maintenance services (e.g., bulb and fuse replacement and cleaning) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical safety composite

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2021→2023

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical injury rate improved

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical's TCR fell 6.4 from 11.1 in 2021 to 4.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=11.1 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561790 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 132% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #10/21
  • PHOTO Best Wash Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Best Wash Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eclipse Lighting & Electrical averages 5.9 TCR (132% of the Lighting maintenance services (e.g., bulb and fuse replacement and cleaning) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical TCR series: 2021=11.1 · 2022=2 · 2023=4.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Eclipse Lighting & Electrical falls in its industry

171 Lighting maintenance services establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 21 Lighting maintenance services employers in California.

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical (51 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Eclipse Lighting & Electrical
Eclipse Lighting & Electrical (51 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Eclipse Lighting & Electrical has more employees than the Lighting maintenance services (e.g., bul median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.7 3.1 3 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 11.1 11.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561790 · CA · Anaheim

171 Lighting maintenance services (e.g., bulb and fuse replacement and cleaning) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Best Wash Inc 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enviromatic Corporation of America, inc. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Contemporary Watercrafters, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fixed Assets, Inc. 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert Young Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&W Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huber Farms Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers Farms Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Wurth Wood Group Charlotte 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stanley Miller Construction Co Main 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brownsburg Health Care Center 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Spee Dee Delivery Service, Inc - Minot 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kitsap_Potelco 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lufkin: Construction 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-2 COOPER ST 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE GEO Specialty Chemicals 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.