Lumber and Woodworking Distributor · North Carolina

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~30 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte runs at 270% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lumber and Woodworking Distributor workplace, earning a grade F.

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte: 5.9 TCR = 270% of Lumber and Woodworking Distributor BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte safety composite

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.3

2016→2023

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte injury rate improved

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte's TCR fell 14.3 from 14.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.3 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=5.6 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.9 · 270% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #51/68
  • PHOTO Kitchen Cabinet Desi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kitchen Cabinet Designers LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wurth Wood Group Charlotte averages 5.9 TCR (270% of the Lumber and Woodworking Distributor BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte TCR series: 2016=14.3 · 2018=7 · 2019=5.6 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Wurth Wood Group Charlotte falls in its industry

1,225 Lumber and Woodworking Distrib establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 68 Lumber and Woodworking Distrib employers in North Carolina.

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte (30 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wurth Wood Group Charlotte
Wurth Wood Group Charlotte (30 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Wurth Wood Group Charlotte has fewer employees than the Lumber and Woodworking Distributor median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.6 2.8 2 0 0
2018 7.0 3.5 2 0 0
2016 14.3 10.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · NC · Charlotte

1,225 Lumber and Woodworking Distributor employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kitchen Cabinet Designers LLC 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CBSI Hagerstown 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tucker - Anderson 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fitzsimmons Lumber, Inc. DBA White Pine Lumber, Distr. 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shugart Farm 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hays Hatchery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hight Family Farms LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Point Operations Center 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Eclipse Lighting & Electrical 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stanley Miller Construction Co Main 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brownsburg Health Care Center 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Spee Dee Delivery Service, Inc - Minot 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Progreso LMMM San Antonio #8, LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 55444 Okc Rac 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suntyx LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson Resource Center - PNG 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.