Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) · Minnesota
ECM Princeton 11-PL MN
Princeton, MN · ~97 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 4.9
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
ECM Princeton 11-PL MN runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) workplace, earning a grade D.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 4.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 21
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares ECM Princeton 11-PL MN's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 4 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
ECM Princeton 11-PL MN's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where ECM Princeton 11-PL MN falls in its industry
2,259 Commercial lithographic (offse establishmentsSafer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #99 safest of 126 Commercial lithographic (offse employers in Minnesota.
ECM Princeton 11-PL MN has an average TCR of 4.9, which is 148% of the industry average (3.3) for Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books). This is worse than average.
The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.
Trend analysis for ECM Princeton 11-PL MN
Between 2018 and 2021, ECM Princeton 11-PL MN's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 6.6 to 6.8 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 2% increase across 3 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2019, at a TCR of 1.1, while 2021 saw the highest rate, at 6.8, a spread of 5.7 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 4 reporting years, ECM Princeton 11-PL MN recorded 21 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 4-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from ECM Princeton 11-PL MN's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 323111 - Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books).
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2021)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
4 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 148,115 hours worked = 5.40 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ECM Princeton 11-PL MN (this establishment) | 4.89 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 4-year avg |
| Commercial flexographic printing (except books) industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 323111 |
| Minnesota state avg (all industries) | 5.18 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by ECM Princeton 11-PL MN to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2021: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 11 reportable incidents · 11 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6.8 | 5.4 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on ECM Princeton 11-PL MN's reported OSHA injury record versus its Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 148% of the Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) benchmark, ECM Princeton 11-PL MN reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is ECM Princeton 11-PL MN's safety grade?
How many injuries has ECM Princeton 11-PL MN reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within Minnesota - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~4.9)
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.