Oil and gas field distribution line construction · Oklahoma

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G)

Tulsa, OK · ~97 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Oil and gas field distribution line construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G): 0.8 TCR = 28% of Oil and gas field distribution line construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) safety composite

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2019→2021

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) injury rate improved

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G)'s TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.6 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/35
  • PHOTO 105212 - Montana Ren…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 105212 - Montana Renewables RDR/SAF Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) averages 0.8 TCR (28% of the Oil and gas field distribution line construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) TCR series: 2019=1.6 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) falls in its industry

809 Oil and gas field distribution establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 35 Oil and gas field distribution employers in Oklahoma.

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) (97 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G)
Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) (97 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Tulsa (Ridgeview-SPI) FS (IND, O and G) has fewer employees than the Oil and gas field distribution line cons median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.6 0.8 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · OK · Tulsa

809 Oil and gas field distribution line construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 105212 - Montana Renewables RDR/SAF Construction 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Pipeline Systems Durango 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockford Corporation 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grae-Con Process Piping llc 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CKenergy Electric Cooperative 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Direct Traffic Control, Inc. 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raytheon_Lawton_OK_11th Street 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE OKC 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR #18 New Concord 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Memphis Corporate Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ServiceSource NGA 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston Extrusions 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corona, CA CS Office/Warehouse 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ken Garner Manufacturing - CHO 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE USCS- Lebanon, IN 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forum Energy Technologies - 2005 Garden Rd. 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.