Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing · Minnesota

EcoWater Systems LLC

Woodbury, MN · ~119 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EcoWater Systems LLC runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

EcoWater Systems LLC: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EcoWater Systems LLC safety composite

EcoWater Systems LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

EcoWater Systems LLC held a steady TCR band

EcoWater Systems LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Woodbury, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/12
  • PHOTO Old Hickory Management
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Old Hickory Management (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

EcoWater Systems LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EcoWater Systems LLC averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EcoWater Systems LLC TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where EcoWater Systems LLC falls in its industry

242 Filters, industrial and genera establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 12 Filters, industrial and genera employers in Minnesota.

EcoWater Systems LLC (119 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate EcoWater Systems LLC
EcoWater Systems LLC (119 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

EcoWater Systems LLC has more employees than the Filters, industrial and general line (ex median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · MN · Woodbury

242 Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 151 employers in Woodbury, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Old Hickory Management 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guild Associates, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FSP-Marinette 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jet Edge Acquisition, LLC 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rice Companies Inc. 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lindsay Windows Minnesota 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE WSI Industries, Inc. 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sonny's Hydra-Flex Backroom 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR MasTec Utility Services, LLC 4,307 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Services Group 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthEast -Woodwinds Hospital 1,065 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodwinds Hospital 903 FTE
NAT-TCR Monroe NC Yard 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnhart-Reese Construction, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR R Adams 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Maiden Lane 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4020187 - UCI Irvine Campus Medical Complex 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barnes, Inc. 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acuity Hospital of New Jersey, L.L.C. (d/b/a Select Specialty Hospital - Atlantic City) 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodland Terrace of Carmel 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.