Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Ecumen prairie Lodge

Minneapolis, MN · ~58 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ecumen prairie Lodge runs at 441% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Ecumen prairie Lodge: 16.8 TCR = 441% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ecumen prairie Lodge safety composite

Ecumen prairie Lodge scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.3

2021→2024

Ecumen prairie Lodge injury rate improved

Ecumen prairie Lodge's TCR fell 22.3 from 25.2 in 2021 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 36.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=25.2 · 2022=36.5 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.8 · 441% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #213/240
  • PHOTO The Neighborhood at …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Neighborhood at Paducah (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Ecumen prairie Lodge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ecumen prairie Lodge averages 16.8 TCR (441% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ecumen prairie Lodge TCR series: 2021=25.2 · 2022=36.5 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Ecumen prairie Lodge falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #213 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Ecumen prairie Lodge (58 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ecumen prairie Lodge
Ecumen prairie Lodge (58 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Ecumen prairie Lodge has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2022 36.5 7.8 12 2 0
2021 25.2 3.6 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Minneapolis

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Neighborhood at Paducah 16.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rose Meadow Farm 16.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Horizons 16.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Marymoor 16.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vireo Health of MN - Otsego 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms SE Misc MN 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2101-Redwood Falls, MN (Monsanto Co.) 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Office 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Cargo Handling Airport Services, LLC 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Union Pier Terminal 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Neighborhood at Paducah 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR North City Water Reclamation Plant 16.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avantara Pierre 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Platt Brothers & Co. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carpenters Pole and Piling 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poet Bioprocessing 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.