Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) · Minnesota

Smith Foundry Company Inc

Minneapolis, MN · ~58 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
31.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smith Foundry Company Inc runs at 966% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) workplace, earning a grade F.

Smith Foundry Company Inc: 31.9 TCR = 966% of Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smith Foundry Company Inc safety composite

Smith Foundry Company Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 31.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.1

2018→2023

Smith Foundry Company Inc injury rate improved

Smith Foundry Company Inc's TCR fell 13.1 from 33.8 in 2018 to 20.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 43.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=33.8 · 2019=43.1 · 2020=30.0 · 2023=20.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331511 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 31.9 · 966% of ind

  • DART 11.1 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO St. Marys Foundry, I…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 82 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Marys Foundry, Inc. (2.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Smith Foundry Company Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smith Foundry Company Inc averages 31.9 TCR (966% of the Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Smith Foundry Company Inc TCR series: 2018=33.8 · 2019=43.1 · 2020=30 · 2023=20.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Smith Foundry Company Inc falls in its industry

272 Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile employers in Minnesota.

Smith Foundry Company Inc (58 employees, TCR 31.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Smith Foundry Company Inc
Smith Foundry Company Inc (58 employees, TCR 31.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Smith Foundry Company Inc has fewer employees than the Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 20.7 11.1 13 0 0
2020 30.0 16.7 18 0 0
2019 43.1 30.3 27 0 0
2018 33.8 26.7 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331511 · MN · Minneapolis

272 Foundries, iron (i.e., ductile, gray, malleable, semisteel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Marys Foundry, Inc. 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamburg Plow Works Inc. 29.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern California 29.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Foundries, Inc. 28.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Home Office 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allina Health Savage Clinic 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE City Hall/Fire Station 1 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pier Foundry & Pattern Shop, Inc. 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Triax Industries 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mettler CA 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sefton Steel 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whited Ford Truck Center 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.