Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows

Worthington, MN · ~72 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows runs at 298% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows: 11.3 TCR = 298% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows safety composite

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows: 11.8 → 17.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2022

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows's TCR rose 5.4 from 11.8 in 2017 to 17.2 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Worthington, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 298% of ind

  • DART 12.3 DART
  • RANK #154/226
  • PHOTO Chapel View Homes Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chapel View Homes Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ecumen Worthington The Meadows averages 11.3 TCR (298% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows TCR series: 2017=11.8 · 2021=5 · 2022=17.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Ecumen Worthington The Meadows falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #154 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows (72 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ecumen Worthington The Meadows
Ecumen Worthington The Meadows (72 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Ecumen Worthington The Meadows has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 17.2 12.3 2 5 0
2021 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2017 11.8 7.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Worthington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 59 employers in Worthington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chapel View Homes Inc 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Care Grand Meadows 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts King of Prussia 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Cottages 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Jackson JAC1 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACI Asphalt and Concrete, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electrical Production Services Inc 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Soybean Processors 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWIFT PORK COMPANY - WORTHINGTON 2,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWIFT PORK COMPANY WORTHINGTON 2,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bedford Industries 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN,WORTHINGTON - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 272 FTE
NAT-TCR American Bridge Company - 482210 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rpo Atl 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HG147 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vancouver Export Terminal 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Support Solution-LMT inc 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iowa DOT - Highway Beautification 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reichhold Morris 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #360 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.