Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Arden Courts King of Prussia

King of Prussia, PA · ~46 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arden Courts King of Prussia runs at 298% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Arden Courts King of Prussia: 11.3 TCR = 298% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arden Courts King of Prussia safety composite

Arden Courts King of Prussia scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.7

2016→2023

Arden Courts King of Prussia injury rate improved

Arden Courts King of Prussia's TCR fell 8.7 from 20.3 in 2016 to 11.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 20.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.3 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=12.0 · 2023=11.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · King of Prussia, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 298% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #197/257
  • PHOTO Chapel View Homes Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chapel View Homes Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Arden Courts King of Prussia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arden Courts King of Prussia averages 11.3 TCR (298% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arden Courts King of Prussia TCR series: 2016=20.3 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=12 · 2023=11.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Arden Courts King of Prussia falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #197 safest of 257 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Arden Courts King of Prussia (46 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arden Courts King of Prussia
Arden Courts King of Prussia (46 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Arden Courts King of Prussia has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.6 4.6 5 0 0
2021 12.0 3.0 4 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 10.3 5.2 3 1 0
2016 20.3 15.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · King of Prussia

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 183 employers in King of Prussia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chapel View Homes Inc 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Care Grand Meadows 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecumen Worthington The Meadows 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Cottages 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Needham's Mushroom Farms, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Pride Inc / Bell & Evans Hatchery 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mushroom Casing, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Elizabethtown ELI1 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR 199897 9,243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Valley Forge (1029) 2,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSL Behring, King of Prussia 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DPH2 1,109 FTE
NAT-TCR Macy's Termite & Pest Control dba Good News Pest Solutions 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Northern Construction Co Inc 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Central School Corporation 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherrelyn Healthcare Center 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE STR0358 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homeland 200 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thorofare 097 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE VRS Indianapolis, IN 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.