Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Dakota

Edgewood Management Group, LLC

Grand Forks, ND · ~83 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edgewood Management Group, LLC runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Edgewood Management Group, LLC: 0.8 TCR = 21% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edgewood Management Group, LLC safety composite

Edgewood Management Group, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Edgewood Management Group, LLC: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.01× in 2023

Edgewood Management Group, LLC's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2022 to 1.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Grand Forks, ND AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 21% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO 60083 SUNRISE AT SIL…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 60083 SUNRISE AT SILAS BURKE HOUSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Edgewood Management Group, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edgewood Management Group, LLC averages 0.8 TCR (21% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Edgewood Management Group, LLC TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Edgewood Management Group, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Dakota.

Edgewood Management Group, LLC (83 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Edgewood Management Group, LLC
Edgewood Management Group, LLC (83 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Edgewood Management Group, LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · ND · Grand Forks

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 175 employers in Grand Forks, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 60083 SUNRISE AT SILAS BURKE HOUSE 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morada Albuquerque 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardens at Arkanshire, The 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solstice Senior Living at Plano 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Key Contracting, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3128 DAN'S WEST BISMARCK 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : FAR - Fargo 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Altru Health System Med Park 2,709 FTE
CITY-NEAR LM Wind Power 907 FTE
CITY-NEAR LM Wind Power : Grand Forks 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Eldercare Center 606 FTE
NAT-TCR Cif (Jblm) 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Allegany Ballistics Laboratory, Rocket Center, WV 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR London Ky Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kitchell Contractors, Inc. - California 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE North 40 Outfitters #G 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE RSA Engineered Products CA 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE North 40 Outfitters #1 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santa Ana Base - Bld: 0417 - 15 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.