Wind turbines (i.e., windmill) manufacturing · North Dakota
LM Wind Power
Grand Forks, ND · ~907 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.0
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
LM Wind Power runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Wind turbines (i.e., windmill) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.
LM Wind Power: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Wind turbines (i.e., windmill) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)
LM Wind Power safety composite
LM Wind Power scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
48/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- D 2.01 per 100 workers
Safer than 48% of industry peers
- DART rate
- D 0.58 per 100 workers
Safer than 45% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−0.8
2017→2022
LM Wind Power injury rate improved
LM Wind Power's TCR fell 0.8 from 2.6 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2017=2.6 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.7
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 333611 · Grand Forks, ND AT/BELOW-IND · MID
Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind
- DART 0.6 DART
- RANK P48
- PHOTO Gas Power Systems : …
- BOOK 5y book
- INJ 79 inj
- SIZE ~907 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →
LM Wind Power in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- Solar Turbines
Solar Turbines incorporated DSHO Office
2.1 TCR
- This site
LM Wind Power
2 TCR
- Gas Power Syst
Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA
2 TCR
- GE Vernova Pen
GE Vernova Pensacola FL
2 TCR
- PCC Airfoils L
PCC Airfoils LLC - Mentor Plant
2 TCR
What this shows LM Wind Power averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Wind turbines (i.e., windmill) manufacturing BLS benchmark).
LM Wind Power TCR series: 2017=2.6 · 2019=2 · 2020=2 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.7 · BLS 3.3
Where LM Wind Power falls in its industry
97 Wind turbines (i.e., windmill) establishmentsSafer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.
LM Wind Power has more employees than the Wind turbines (i.e., windmill) manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 8 | 3 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
333611 · ND · Grand Forks
97 Wind turbines (i.e., windmill) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 175 employers in Grand Forks, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.