Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Edgewood Sartell LLC

Sartell, MN · ~80 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
32.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edgewood Sartell LLC runs at 859% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Edgewood Sartell LLC: 32.7 TCR = 859% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edgewood Sartell LLC safety composite

Edgewood Sartell LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 32.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−24.3

2019→2023

Edgewood Sartell LLC injury rate improved

Edgewood Sartell LLC's TCR fell 24.3 from 61.8 in 2019 to 37.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 68.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=61.8 · 2020=68.9 · 2022=27.8 · 2023=37.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Sartell, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 32.7 · 859% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #226/226
  • PHOTO Primrose Retirement …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 92 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City (2.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Edgewood Sartell LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edgewood Sartell LLC averages 32.7 TCR (859% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Edgewood Sartell LLC TCR series: 2019=61.8 · 2020=68.9 · 2022=27.8 · 2023=37.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Edgewood Sartell LLC falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #226 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Edgewood Sartell LLC (80 employees, TCR 32.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Edgewood Sartell LLC
Edgewood Sartell LLC (80 employees, TCR 32.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Edgewood Sartell LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 37.5 7.9 19 0 0
2022 27.8 5.2 16 0 0
2020 68.9 42.5 20 27 0
2019 61.8 11.7 37 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Sartell

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 38 employers in Sartell, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Blake at Edgewater 29.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Terrace 29.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Castle Peak Senior Care 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Villa at Bryn Mawr 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Todd County Care Center, Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Associated Milk Producers Inc (Paynesville Cheese Manufacturing) 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bobs Produce Ranch 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent School District #748 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR COUNTRY MANOR HLTH & REHAB CENTER 486 FTE
CITY-NEAR Country Manor Campus LLC 453 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dezurik 398 FTE
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Downtown Restaurant Group 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quail Crest Memory Care 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE 55619 Univ of Alabama 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rib Lake Health Services 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.