Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation · Texas

EDP Concrete

San Antonio, TX · ~38 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EDP Concrete runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation workplace, earning a grade C.

EDP Concrete: 2.8 TCR = 101% of Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EDP Concrete safety composite

EDP Concrete scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.7

2017→2021

EDP Concrete injury rate improved

EDP Concrete's TCR fell 8.7 from 8.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.7 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/66
  • PHOTO cHc Fabricating Corp
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: cHc Fabricating Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

EDP Concrete in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EDP Concrete averages 2.8 TCR (101% of the Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EDP Concrete TCR series: 2017=8.7 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where EDP Concrete falls in its industry

705 Concrete product (e.g., struct establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 66 Concrete product (e.g., struct employers in Texas.

EDP Concrete (38 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate EDP Concrete
EDP Concrete (38 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

EDP Concrete has fewer employees than the Concrete product (e.g., structural preca median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.5 5.5 2 0 0
2017 8.7 5.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · TX · San Antonio

705 Concrete product (e.g., structural precast, structural prestressed) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR cHc Fabricating Corp 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Welding 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DKM Steel Construction Corp. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JC Steel Erectors - Belmont Park Retail Village 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS MT. PLEASANT BREEDER AND BROILER 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Agricultural- Danevang 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2362/3714-Lubbock, TX-R&D (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Claremont Fiber Plant 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Everyday Technologies Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cablecom, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 385 Saint Louis Galleria 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1855-WIMIL70 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Blain Companies - Natchez 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Muhlenberg College-Catering 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at General Mills-Main Loc Cafe 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.