Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · Ohio

cHc Fabricating Corp

Cincinnati, OH · ~44 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

cHc Fabricating Corp runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

cHc Fabricating Corp: 2.8 TCR = 101% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

cHc Fabricating Corp safety composite

cHc Fabricating Corp scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2024

cHc Fabricating Corp injury rate improved

cHc Fabricating Corp's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/29
  • PHOTO Phoenix Welding
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phoenix Welding (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

cHc Fabricating Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows cHc Fabricating Corp averages 2.8 TCR (101% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

cHc Fabricating Corp TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where cHc Fabricating Corp falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 29 Structural steel erecting or i employers in Ohio.

cHc Fabricating Corp (44 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate cHc Fabricating Corp
cHc Fabricating Corp (44 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

cHc Fabricating Corp has fewer employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2017 4.2 0.0 2 0 0
2016 4.3 2.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · OH · Cincinnati

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Welding 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR EDP Concrete 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JC Steel Erectors - Belmont Park Retail Village 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.T.S.S. Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Day Farms - Croton 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Licking Rural Electricfication 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus SE Service Center 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant RP 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SII Tuscaloosa 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Plainfield Distribution Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CANANDAIGUA 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodwill CFL - Oviedo 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrisonburg Electric Commission 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colony Tire - Store 08 retread 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeshore Moving 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.