Anchored earth retention contractors · California

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc.

Martinez, CA · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Anchored earth retention contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Anchored earth retention contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. safety composite

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. held a steady TCR band

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Martinez, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/92
  • PHOTO The Goettle Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Goettle Company (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Anchored earth retention contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. falls in its industry

932 Anchored earth retention contr establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 92 Anchored earth retention contr employers in California.

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. (32 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc.
E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. (32 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

E.E. Gilbert Construction Inc. has fewer employees than the Anchored earth retention contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · CA · Martinez

932 Anchored earth retention contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 72 employers in Martinez, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Goettle Company 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turner at Sasol North America Westlake LA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olin Corporation Freeport TX 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Constructors, Inc. 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 58 2,508 FTE
CITY-NEAR Contra Costa Regional Medical Center 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shell Martinez Refinery 740 FTE
CITY-NEAR Contra Costa Electric, Inc. 619 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE S09091 - Allentown MRF 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roseau County Highway Department 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03325 - USA Waste of Oregon - Klamath Falls 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morgan Advanced Ceramics, Inc. - Fairfield Site 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.