Commercial building construction · Texas

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston

Sugar Land, TX · ~109 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston safety composite

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2024

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston injury rate improved

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Sugar Land, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #40/327
  • PHOTO W. G. Yates & Sons C…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: W. G. Yates & Sons Construction Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 327 Commercial building constructi employers in Texas.

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston (109 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston
E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston (109 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston has more employees than the Commercial building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.3 1.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Sugar Land

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 147 employers in Sugar Land, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR W. G. Yates & Sons Construction Company 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burkshire Construction 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR G & M Earth Moving, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northstar Builders Group LLC 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alan Vander Horst 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Falcon Energy Services 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oncor TGM 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE CB JENI Homes, LLC 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED 77,810 FTE
CITY-NEAR TEAM Industrial Services, Inc 5,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schlumberger Sugar Land South 1,934 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Residential, Inc. 1,931 FTE
NAT-TCR W. G. Yates & Sons Construction Company 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Belmont Arthur Ave LDC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rochester Operations 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hays, KS OV104 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dixon Direct 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio Airport 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apex Paper Box Co.- Walworth 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apex NC Truss 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.