Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel · Pennsylvania

Rochester Operations

Rochester, PA · ~20 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rochester Operations runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade A.

Rochester Operations: 0.4 TCR = 11% of Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rochester Operations safety composite

Rochester Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2024

Rochester Operations injury rate improved

Rochester Operations's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Rochester, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/29
  • PHOTO Nucor Cold Finish Wi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucor Cold Finish Wisconsin, Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Rochester Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rochester Operations averages 0.4 TCR (11% of the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rochester Operations TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Rochester Operations falls in its industry

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 29 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g employers in Pennsylvania.

Rochester Operations (20 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rochester Operations
Rochester Operations (20 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Rochester Operations has fewer employees than the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, pl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · PA · Rochester

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 11 employers in Rochester, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucor Cold Finish Wisconsin, Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brackenridge Operations 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgewater 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Cold Finish South Carolina 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE VanBlarcom 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matterns Hatchery 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookfield Renewable - Holtwood 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springdale 3,4,5 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR USA PA Rochester Plant 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giant Eagle #0062 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR US PA Rochester Plant 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR East Rochester Packaging Plant 70 FTE
NAT-TCR E.E. Reed Construction LP - Houston 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR W. G. Yates & Sons Construction Company 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Belmont Arthur Ave LDC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eii, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fort Wayne 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE JSP - Tullahoma 1 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE BK-Aikahi #608 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monmouth Junction 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.