Nursing homes · New York

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center

Staten Island, NY · ~594 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center runs at 302% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center: 19.6 TCR = 302% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 8% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

5/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center: 5.3 → 18.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 48.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.91× in 2021

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 13.1 from 5.3 in 2017 to 18.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 48.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Staten Island, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 19.6 · 302% of ind

  • DART 17.8 DART
  • RANK #585/616
  • PHOTO Central Todd County …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~594 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Central Todd County Care Center, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center averages 19.6 TCR (302% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2019=6 · 2020=48.8 · 2021=18.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #585 safest of 616 Nursing homes employers in New York.

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center (594 employees, TCR 19.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center
Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center (594 employees, TCR 19.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 18.4 17.8 12 49 0
2020 48.8 47.9 20 188 1
2019 6.0 4.3 20 8 0
2017 5.3 4.3 20 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Staten Island

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 256 employers in Staten Island, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Central Todd County Care Center, Inc. 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waterview Pointe 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jonesboro Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LLC 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MapleView Health and Rehabilitation Center 19.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carver Companies 594 FTE
STATE-SIZE GREENPOINT SERVICE CENTER (NY50) 595 FTE
STATE-SIZE 454 - Reliant, Brooklyn, Ny 595 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY_Schenectady_1021 High Bridge Rd._0RAL0860 595 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - JFK8 5,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Staten Island University Hospital North 4,947 FTE
CITY-NEAR Staten Island U Hosp North 4,711 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : JFK8 3,988 FTE
NAT-TCR Atascadero Christian Home 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Otterbein Marblehead 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Todd County Care Center, Inc. 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Good Earth Mill Valley 19.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE thyssenkrupp Bilstein of America Main Plant 594 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westridge 594 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lazydays Tampa 594 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bally's Hotel and Casino - Call Center 594 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.