Natural Gas Distribution · New York

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50)

Brooklyn, NY · ~595 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Natural Gas Distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50): 2.5 TCR = 209% of Natural Gas Distribution BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) safety composite

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2019

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) injury rate improved

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50)'s TCR fell 2.0 from 3.6 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Brooklyn, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 209% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #24/54
  • PHOTO 235-NiSource-Neville…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~595 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 235-NiSource-Neville Island PA MOD Site (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) averages 2.5 TCR (209% of the Natural Gas Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) falls in its industry

1,153 Natural Gas Distribution establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 54 Natural Gas Distribution employers in New York.

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) (595 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50)
Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) (595 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) has more employees than the Natural Gas Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.6 0.8 11 2 0
2018 1.6 1.0 13 0 0
2017 3.2 1.5 22 2 0
2016 3.6 2.9 26 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · NY · Brooklyn

1,153 Natural Gas Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 941 employers in Brooklyn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 235-NiSource-Neville Island PA MOD Site 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jefferson Cocke County Utility District 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTH ALBANY OPERATING HQTRS (NY01) 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LNG Center 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 454 - Reliant, Brooklyn, Ny 595 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY_Schenectady_1021 High Bridge Rd._0RAL0860 595 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carver Companies 594 FTE
STATE-SIZE Theradynamics Rehab Management LLC 596 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDI - Brooklyn 946 9,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. 7,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maimonides Medical Center 6,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn 5,690 FTE
NAT-TCR 4054-Abs 0021 1262 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 1138 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR #14 Art Van Woodward 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Front Street Millwork and Lumber Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations 595 FTE
NAT-SIZE B&E Resources 595 FTE
NAT-SIZE 381604-Cincinnati Ndc 595 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1207 New Lenox School District #122 595 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.