Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers · New York

eGreen Recycling Management

Holtsville, NY · ~19 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

eGreen Recycling Management runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

eGreen Recycling Management: 5.4 TCR = 247% of Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

eGreen Recycling Management safety composite

eGreen Recycling Management scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2023

eGreen Recycling Management injury rate improved

eGreen Recycling Management's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=6.0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=14.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Holtsville, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.4 · 247% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/39
  • PHOTO BRANCH 24
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BRANCH 24 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

eGreen Recycling Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows eGreen Recycling Management averages 5.4 TCR (247% of the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

eGreen Recycling Management TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=6 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=14.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where eGreen Recycling Management falls in its industry

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 39 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl employers in New York.

eGreen Recycling Management (19 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate eGreen Recycling Management
eGreen Recycling Management (19 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

eGreen Recycling Management has fewer employees than the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 14.6 14.6 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2019 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2018 9.5 9.5 1 1 0
2017 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2016 4.3 4.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · NY · Holtsville

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 24 employers in Holtsville, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BRANCH 24 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Management Midwest, Artesian 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berlinsky Scrap Corp. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Friedland Industries, Inc. 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Chatham 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE FRANKLINVILLE CREW LOCATION-NY39 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE STOW SERVICE CENTER-NY41 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE K. Hovnanian Companies NYC - Leroy Office 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR NY21 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Topgolf Holtsville 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR Island Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR DiCarlo Distributors 227 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Silver Springs 9E- 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sherco Gen Plant-LN 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tower Eight Staffing Solutions dba Skilled Resources - Tampa/Fletcher 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Palo Alto 5.4 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.