Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers · Michigan

Friedland Industries, Inc.

Lansing, MI · ~33 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Friedland Industries, Inc. runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Friedland Industries, Inc.: 5.5 TCR = 249% of Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Friedland Industries, Inc. safety composite

Friedland Industries, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Friedland Industries, Inc.: 0.0 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 12.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2024

Friedland Industries, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.6 from 0.0 in 2018 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Lansing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.5 · 249% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #41/62
  • PHOTO City Scrap & Salvage…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City Scrap & Salvage Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Friedland Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Friedland Industries, Inc. averages 5.5 TCR (249% of the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Friedland Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=12.2 · 2022=3 · 2023=5.6 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 2.2

Where Friedland Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 62 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl employers in Michigan.

Friedland Industries, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Friedland Industries, Inc.
Friedland Industries, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Friedland Industries, Inc. has fewer employees than the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 2.8 2 0 0
2023 5.6 2.8 2 0 0
2022 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 12.2 6.1 4 0 0
2020 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2019 5.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · MI · Lansing

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City Scrap & Salvage Company 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glescrap Warren 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRANCH 24 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Alloys 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRH GROUP LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Rivers Svc Ctr 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpena Power Company 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment City of Wyoming 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR J. L. Anderson Company, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mosaic Kansas City 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sacramento District Office 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinnacle HR Group, LLC - Tradition 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Toledo 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pineville Service Center 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1264 PYP Chula Vista 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seattle CGI Depot 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.