Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing · Alabama

E&H Steel Corporation

Midland City, AL · ~68 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E&H Steel Corporation runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

E&H Steel Corporation: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E&H Steel Corporation safety composite

E&H Steel Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

E&H Steel Corporation injury rate improved

E&H Steel Corporation's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.9 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=2.6 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Midland City, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/61
  • PHOTO Stark Metal Sales Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stark Metal Sales Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

E&H Steel Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E&H Steel Corporation averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E&H Steel Corporation TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=2.6 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where E&H Steel Corporation falls in its industry

1,491 Highway bridge sections, prefa establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 61 Highway bridge sections, prefa employers in Alabama.

E&H Steel Corporation (68 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate E&H Steel Corporation
E&H Steel Corporation (68 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

E&H Steel Corporation has more employees than the Highway bridge sections, prefabricated m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 4.6 1.5 3 0 0
2020 4.1 4.1 3 0 0
2019 5.3 4.0 4 0 0
2017 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2016 3.9 1.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · AL · Midland City

1,491 Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 6 employers in Midland City, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stark Metal Sales Inc 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tebbens Steel LLC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Rebar Las Vegas 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Millennium Building Systems, LLC. - Lake City 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pea River Electric Cooperative 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE LSAM Pan Line I 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hagan Fences 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ben Mar Hosiery Inc. 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin North America - US4 Dothan 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility 546 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAU at Michelin US4 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR 40276 - CAPSTONE MICHELIN DOTHAN MFG MIDLAND CITY AL 66 FTE
NAT-TCR Rosedale Chevrolet 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ELIZABETH 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Related Hybrid Companies LLC 20 Hudson Yards 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hajoca 193 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vinyl Visions, LLC 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joe Gibbs Racing LLC - NC: XFN, DEV 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kirby Risk Distribution Center 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Basler Turbo Conversions, LLC 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.