Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing · Alabama

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility

Midland City, AL · ~546 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility safety composite

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2022→2024

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility injury rate improved

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.4 in 2022 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326211 · Midland City, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Heavy Duty Tire & Tr…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~546 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heavy Duty Tire & Tread d/b/a Highlands Tire & Service (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility TCR series: 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility falls in its industry

114 Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-p establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-p employers in Alabama.

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility (546 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 393 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility
Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility (546 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 393 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Michelin NA - US4 Dothan Facility has more employees than the Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 2 1 0
2023 1.3 0.7 7 0 0
2022 1.4 0.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326211 · AL · Midland City

114 Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 6 employers in Midland City, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heavy Duty Tire & Tread d/b/a Highlands Tire & Service 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michelin North America - US4 Dothan 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michelin US5 Lexington SC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pirelli Tire LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 200401 546 FTE
STATE-SIZE Par - Tablets 548 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 549 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanon Systems Alabama 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAU at Michelin US4 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR E&H Steel Corporation 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR 40276 - CAPSTONE MICHELIN DOTHAN MFG MIDLAND CITY AL 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR 40276 - CAPSTONE MICHELIN DOTHAN AL MFG 28 FTE
NAT-TCR Intuitive 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nevada Amigo Office-PYT 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Detroit Dismantling Corporation 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Panhandle Power Solutions LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HDC3 546 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penelec 546 FTE
NAT-SIZE NM Transfer/Neenah 546 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 2 - 02 546 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.