Conservation and reclamation agencies · Minnesota

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters

New Ulm, MN · ~86 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Conservation and reclamation agencies workplace, earning a grade C.

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters: 3.6 TCR = 112% of Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters safety composite

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters: 3.0 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2024

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters's TCR rose 1.6 from 3.0 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · New Ulm, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 112% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #23/45
  • PHOTO Cary Park District -…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cary Park District - Cary, IL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters averages 3.6 TCR (112% of the Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=5 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.2

Where EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters falls in its industry

413 Conservation and reclamation a establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 45 Conservation and reclamation a employers in Minnesota.

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters (86 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters
EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters (86 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

EI072 - New Ulm Headquarters has more employees than the Conservation and reclamation agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 3.5 4 0 0
2023 3.6 2.4 1 2 0
2022 5.0 5.0 3 1 0
2021 3.5 1.2 1 2 0
2020 3.6 3.6 2 1 0
2019 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · MN · New Ulm

413 Conservation and reclamation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 79 employers in New Ulm, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cary Park District - Cary, IL 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vernon Hills Park District 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Of Sacramento-Recreation Services Roll-Up (190016) 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Fish & Game (33) 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 34 RECC 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Palmer Soderberg, Inc. 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Drilling 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lloyd's Construction Services, Inc. 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR J&R Schugel Trucking, Inc. 926 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Ulm 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Ulm Medical Center 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Luther College 441 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlanta South-Jonesboro 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health Sacramento 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mechanical Construction 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Patterson Pump Company 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Chicago 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fresno County 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE T&G Constructors 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Ag Labor Services, Inc. 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.