Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Indiana

The Forum at the Crossing

Indianapolis, IN · ~118 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Forum at the Crossing runs at 338% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Forum at the Crossing: 12.9 TCR = 338% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Forum at the Crossing safety composite

The Forum at the Crossing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2019→2023

The Forum at the Crossing injury rate improved

The Forum at the Crossing's TCR fell 1.0 from 5.1 in 2019 to 4.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 29.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.1 · 2020=29.5 · 2023=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 338% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #116/133
  • PHOTO KRE-BSL HUSKY PLYMOU…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KRE-BSL HUSKY PLYMOUTH OPERATION LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

The Forum at the Crossing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Forum at the Crossing averages 12.9 TCR (338% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Forum at the Crossing TCR series: 2019=5.1 · 2020=29.5 · 2023=4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Forum at the Crossing falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #116 safest of 133 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

The Forum at the Crossing (118 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Forum at the Crossing
The Forum at the Crossing (118 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Forum at the Crossing has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2020 29.5 29.5 0 27 0
2019 5.1 5.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Indianapolis

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY PLYMOUTH OPERATION LLC 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Hamilton 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinship Pointe at McCook 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOLARIS SENIOR LIVING STUART 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indianapolis, IN HVAC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomas Plastic Machinery 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edsal Manufacturing Company Inc. 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prairie Farms Dairy - Holland 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR North Platte Terminal 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillsboro Dirt Cheap 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6V US Foods Denver South 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Willow Gardens 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE El Camino Gardens 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE H&H Wallboard, Inc. 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE TOW By Fanatics 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Orleans Iron Works, L.L.C. 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.