Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Michigan

E&L Construction Group

Flint, MI · ~153 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E&L Construction Group runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

E&L Construction Group: 0.2 TCR = 8% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E&L Construction Group safety composite

E&L Construction Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

E&L Construction Group: 0.0 → 0.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 0.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

E&L Construction Group's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Flint, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/121
  • PHOTO Muckleroy & Falls
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Muckleroy & Falls (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

E&L Construction Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E&L Construction Group averages 0.2 TCR (8% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E&L Construction Group TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 2.9

Where E&L Construction Group falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 121 Construction management, comme employers in Michigan.

E&L Construction Group (153 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate E&L Construction Group
E&L Construction Group (153 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

E&L Construction Group has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MI · Flint

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 260 employers in Flint, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Muckleroy & Falls 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ET Environmental Corp., LLC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cranshaw Construction of New England 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR New South Construction Company, LLC 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE D&D Building, Inc 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin City Foods - Lake Odessa 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Backyard Products 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Battle Creek MI 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Flint Truck Assembly 5,164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Assembly 3,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hurley Medical Center 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Flint 2,477 FTE
NAT-TCR New South Construction Company, LLC 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Novavine 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stanton 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Raytheon_McKinney_TX 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seakeeper, Inc PA 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Specialty Coating Systems Clear Lake 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Texas prod Corp 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palm Garden of Orlando, LLC 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.